Why you need multiple Twitters

on vacationI thought of my reaction Elon Musk buys Twitter And whether it is different from the Nijerk analysis we already have. As a general rule, when writing about technology-related themes, I try to take a different angle than what I’ve already covered.

so I”Let’s stop Twitter“Viewpoint or”Elon Musk should be banned from buying Twitter“Position or”Twitter goes to hell with a new conservative hand basket” perspective.

But you need to consider why you care about Twitter. It serves an important role as an instantly public broadcast message bus for individuals, brands, governments, and everyone in between. But it also has many weaknesses, including not being a public good-it’s a business, and if Elon Musk gives way, it’s privately owned again.

Therefore, it always reflects its ownership and designated controls, except for government policies that limit its authority, how Twitter runs, the overall technology vision, and enforced policies. This also applies to Facebook and its various Internet properties, but its basic functionality is much wider than Twitter.

If Twitter is owned by Elon Musk, it will change leadership and potentially ethical direction regarding the content and influential entities allowed on the platform. We can endlessly discuss what systematic changes occur under the mask and whether they are good or bad. But the world outside of Twitter is constantly in flux as governments and leaders come and go. The same goes for the general public feeling that they are ethically allowed to broadcast, as well as having unethical or disgust.

That’s why I believe microblogging, a generic term for Twitter’s service types, needs to be a fundamental part of the Internet’s infrastructure, much like SMTP email, DNS, and the Web. And just as these services are standardized, from a protocol perspective, through organizations such as ISO, ANSI, Ecma, IEC.

I don’t know how many services like Twitter are needed, dozens, hundreds, or thousands. Or tens of thousands. But it’s clear that Twitter has many types of voices, all of which are listening and competing. Subject to an unknown algorithm that determines who’s voice emerges when.. But suppose the voice community is loud enough or wants to amplify itself. In that case, it should be able to host its own microblogging platform if it is allowed in the country that chooses to bring itself home and has the resources to do so.

Also: Forget the algorithm: this is what makes Twitter really unique

It doesn’t matter if it’s a government agency, academic and scientific community, vertical industry, or a group of people who decide they need their own platform-the reason for forming a microblogging community is a common purpose. I need a perspective, what is there?

Suppose you can create an international standard for microblogging protocols and APIs that determine client / server connections. Suppose the open source community can create microblogging server infrastructure, clients, and APIs. How can I get the visibility I need?

As with your domain registrar, you’ll have access to directories and federation services where you can register all of this. This allows microblogging clients or systems that can connect to the API to have an integrated “feed” for these platforms, such as posts and conversation exchanges, like a crossposted discussion thread within USENET.

This does not mean that all microblogging platforms have intelligent and thoughtful conversations. Rather, if you are federated under a common set of protocols, it’s easy to find one. This has the effect of equalizing the “signal-to-noise ratio” over time as more and more microblogging platforms emerge and become discoverable. While improving the quality of conversations, it also reduces the madness that often takes over Twitter.

This is a vision of how to create a more decentralized (and therefore less susceptible to capture by one entity, government, or other way) social media platform. A platform that allows people to voluntarily associate themselves with like-minded individuals.

Blockchain technology and others Content source and authentication technologies such as C2PAYou can ensure transaction and referential integrity between systems and prove ownership of posted content. For single sign-on, you can use various open authentication mechanisms that are already standardized on other platforms such as Google ID, Microsoft ID, Facebook, and of course Apple, Amazon, Twitter, and so on. Accounts can be created and integrated on these platforms. This includes allowing accounts on one system to join another system through a trust relationship.

This is possible, but we need a community of people who find value in decentralization. Who makes this? i don’t know. But if you don’t, someone else will do so and they may not have our best interests in mind.

Also: No, Elon, Twitter will not be a “free speech” platform

With a distributed network of dozens, thousands, or tens of thousands of microblogging platforms, you have your own problems. There is endless debate about how a platform or individual is “cancelled” by another platform or individual, and which platform continues to allow such offensive content. A new form of politics is involved when a particular group or account engages in actions that another community deems unfavorable.

Will the trust be broken and the offending account and platform be shut down? Does the platform change its terms of use to prohibit certain speech or actions that are not in line with its values? We will never know unless we start on this path towards alternative networks for decentralization and communication.

The benefits here outweigh the negatives. Again, it doesn’t depend on the whims of a single entity as to how to determine conflicts. Nor is it limited to a single country, company, or even a single management philosophy. We regain control of the Internet from the few people who want to operate us and hold the key to our platform.

You will be able to run your community the way you want. Creating an environment that doesn’t provide the features, moods, and values ​​that users want will quickly fail and succeed.

I believe this is the next step in the evolution of the Internet, starting with you. By helping to create these communities or platform providers, you can become part of your solution. You can do this with software development, systems management, design, user experience, or business skills.

Now is the time. Let’s build a better internet together.

Source link